Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524684›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Synthesis of Carboxylate-Dialdehyde Cellulose to Use as a Component in Composite Thin Films for an Antibacterial Material in Wound Dressing.

Tanpong Chaiwarit, Kwanjit Duangsonk, Sastra Yuantrakul, Baramee Chanabodeechalermrung, Waristha Khangtragool, Claire-Hélène Brachais, Odile Chambin, Pensak Jantrawut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of ClinicalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tanpong ChaiwaritDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5531-4692
Kwanjit DuangsonkDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Sastra YuantrakulDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Baramee ChanabodeechalermrungDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Waristha KhangtragoolDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Claire-Hélène BrachaisICMUB UMR CNRS 6302, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 9 Avenue Alain Savary, Dijon 21000, France.
Odile ChambinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, UMR PAM, University of Bourgogne, 7 bd Jeanne d'Arc, Dijon 21079, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9627-6073
Pensak JantrawutDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound infections can lead to life-threatening infection and death. Antibacterial materials from biopolymers in the form of films are a promising strategy for wound dressings. Carboxylate-dialdehyde cellulose (CDAC) is a proper candidate for use as an antibacterial material due to its biocompatibility, nontoxicity, and antibacterial property. Additionally, CDAC can be synthesized from cellulose through environmentally friendly and nontoxic methods. Thus, this study aims to synthesize CDAC from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) PH102 and use it in composite films for an antibacterial application. The CDAC was synthesized using Fe

Identifiers

PMID39524684
PMCPMC11541528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.