ArticleACS omega2024
Single-Extracellular-Vesicle Detection with a Plasmonic Chip and Enhanced Fluorescence Microscopy.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocytosis-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), which can be as small as 100 nm, are useful for disease prediction. However, very small EVs are below the optical diffraction limit and are difficult to visualize with conventional fluorescence microscopy. In this study, single EVs captured on a plasmonic chip, where fluorescently labeled antibodies were bound over the EV surface, were detected as bright spots using plasmon-field enhanced fluorescence without any pretreatment of isolating labeled EVs, followed by analyzing the full width at half-maximum and the fluorescence peak value for each enhanced fluorescence bright spot. Bright spots smaller than the threshold determined by the observation of the fluorescent nanospheres were attributed to single EVs. The number of single EVs was quantitatively evaluated against the concentration of EV solution injected in the 1.4 pM-95 fM range. Furthermore, single EVs were detected by labeling two different membrane proteins. A molecularly imprinted polymer was applied to a capture interface on a plasmonic chip, and it is found that nonspecific adsorption of aggregates was suppressed. To accurately distinguish single EVs from aggregates of labeled antibodies, the fluorescence microscopy with transmitted light was superior to the epifluorescence method. Finally, single EVs were successfully detected with multiple targets at multiple wavelengths by using different fluorescently labeled antibodies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.