ReviewACS omega2024
A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Additive Manufacturing toward Orthopedic Applications.
Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The multilayer coatings on polylactic acid implants spatiotemporally regulates the microenvironment to enhance antibacterial and osseointegration capacity.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- A comprehensive evaluation on the bioactivity, antibacterial efficacy and cell viability of PVA-PVP-chitosan electrospun scaffolds reinforced with calcium/zinc silicate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advanced additive manufacturing in orthopedics: a comprehensive review of biomaterials, structural design, biological functions and clinical technology applications.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing Orthopedics through Integration of Artificial Intelligence and 3D Printing for Enhanced Patient Care.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Manufacturing, Microstructure, and Mechanics of 316L SS Biomaterials by Laser Powder Bed Fusion.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Reviewing Additive Manufacturing Techniques: Material Trends and Weight Optimization Possibilities Through Innovative Printing Patterns.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human bone holds an inherent capacity for repairing itself from trauma and damage, but concerning the severity of the defect, the choice of implant placement is a must. Additive manufacturing has become an elite option due to its various specifications such as patient-specific custom development of implants and its easy fabrication rather than the conventional methods used over the years. Additive manufacturing allows customization of the pore size, porosity, various mechanical properties, and complex structure design and formulation. Selective laser melting, powder bed fusion, electron beam melting, and fused deposition modeling are the various AM methods used extensively for implant fabrication. Metals, polymers, biocrystals, composites, and bio-HEA materials are used for implant fabrication for various applications. A wide variety of polymer implants are fabricated using additive manufacturing for nonload-bearing applications, and β-tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, etc. are mainly used as ceramic materials in additive manufacturing due to the biological properties that could be imparted by the latter. For decades metals have played a major role in implant fabrication, and additive manufacturing of metals provides an easy approach to implant fabrication with augmented qualities. Various challenges and setbacks faced in the fabrication need postprocessing such as sintering, coating, surface polishing, etc. The emergence of bio-HEA materials, printing of shape memory implants, and five-dimensional printing are the trends of the era in additive manufacturing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.