Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524561›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2024

Deep learning networks-based tomato disease and pest detection: a first review of research studies using real field datasets.

Mohieddine Jelali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohieddine JelaliCologne Lab for Artificial Intelligence and Smart Automation (CAISA), Institute of Product Development and Engineering Design (IPK), TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in deep neural networks in terms of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have enabled researchers to significantly improve the accuracy and speed of object recognition systems and their application to plant disease and pest detection and diagnosis. This paper presents the first comprehensive review and analysis of deep learning approaches for disease and pest detection in tomato plants, using self-collected field-based and benchmarking datasets extracted from real agricultural scenarios. The review shows that only a few studies available in the literature used data from real agricultural fields such as the PlantDoc dataset. The paper also reveals overoptimistic results of the huge number of studies in the literature that used the PlantVillage dataset collected under (controlled) laboratory conditions. This finding is consistent with the characteristics of the dataset, which consists of leaf images with a uniform background. The uniformity of the background images facilitates object detection and classification, resulting in higher performance-metric values for the models. However, such models are not very useful in agricultural practice, and it remains desirable to establish large datasets of plant diseases under real conditions. With some of the self-generated datasets from real agricultural fields reviewed in this paper, high performance values above 90% can be achieved by applying different (improved) CNN architectures such as Faster R-CNN and YOLO.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksdeep learningobject detectionplant disease detectiontomato datasets

Identifiers

PMID39524561
PMCPMC11543466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.