ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2024
Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Stewardship Quality Improvement Project for Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary NICU in Lima, Peru.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of preoperative chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) double-cleansing in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) in surgical patients in neonatal intensive care units. Methods: A retrospective chart review involved 56 patients who underwent 73 surgical procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2013 to 2022. CHG double-cleansing involves the following 2 processes. Firstly, preoperative cleansing with 0.5% CHG for elective surgeries the night before or at least 1 hour before emergency surgery. The anterior trunk cleansing spanned from the neck to the pubis, including both axillary lines. Secondly, the surgical site underwent skin preparation using 2% CHG with 72% isopropyl alcohol before an incision. A control group (2013-2018) that used iodine and a CHG group (2019-2022) employing CHG double-cleansing were compared. The occurrence of SSIs within 30 days after the surgical procedure was assessed. Results: The overall SSI rate was 16.4% (n = 12) in the total procedures. The SSI rate was significantly higher (22.6%) in the control group; no SSI occurred in the CHG group (P = 0.029). No significant differences were observed in the other parameters. No adverse effects were observed in the CHG group. Conclusion: CHG double-cleansing, a modified approach for surgical patients in the NICU, effectively reduced the incidence of SSI compared to traditional iodine-based skin preparations. This study supports the safe use of CHG in neonates, including premature infants, without significant complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.