ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2024
Knowledge of energy-based devices among surgical residents: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the knowledge of surgical residents in a tertiary hospital regarding the operational principles, potential complications, and mechanisms of energy devices used in surgery. Methods: A 16-question test was developed using educational materials in the "Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE)" program, prepared by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) for educational purposes, and from literature on energy devices. The test was shared online with surgical branch residents via Google Forms, and they were asked to complete it. Participants were given one week to complete the test and return the results online. Results: A total of 108 residents voluntarily participated in the study. The average number of correct answers was 6.5 out of 16. There was no significant difference between the correct answer rates for surgical branches. However, an increase in surgical seniority was associated with a higher number of correct answers (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Theoretical education about energy devices in surgical training needs to be improved. Surgical residents reported insufficient knowledge regarding the devices' operational principles and complication mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.