ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2024
Walking recovers cartilage compressive strain in vivo.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Historical Evaluation of Articular Cartilage Lubrication Studies Reveals Distinct Testing Approach Specific Behaviors.Journal of tribology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Articular cartilage is a fiber reinforced hydrated solid that serves a largely mechanical role of supporting load and enabling low friction joint articulation. Daily activities that load cartilage, lead to fluid exudation and compressive axial strain. To date, the only mechanism shown to recover this cartilage strain in vivo is unloading (e.g., lying supine). Based on recent work in cartilage explants, we hypothesized that loaded joint activity (walking) would also be capable of strain recovery in cartilage. Methods: Eight asymptomatic young adults performed a fixed series of tasks, each of which was followed by magnetic resonance imaging to track changes in their knee cartilage thickness. The order of tasks was as follows: 1) stand for 30 min, 2) walk for 10 min, 3) stand for 30 min, and 4) lie supine for 50 min. The change in cartilage thickness was used to compute the axial cartilage strain. Results: Standing produced an average axial strain of -5.1 % (compressive) in the tibiofemoral knee cartilage, while lying supine led to strain recovery. In agreement with our hypothesis, walking also led to cartilage strain recovery. Interestingly, the recovery rate during walking (0.19 % strain/min) was nearly 3-fold faster than lying supine (0.07 % strain/min). Conclusions: This study represents the first in vivo demonstration that joint activity is capable of recovering compressive strain in cartilage. These findings indicate that joint activities such as walking may play a key role in maintaining and recovering cartilage strain, with implications for maintaining cartilage health and preventing or delaying cartilage degeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.