ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2024
Referral, enrollment, and health care use in a comprehensive patient-centered management program for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Machine Learning Algorithms Predicting Psychological Distress After Total Joint Arthroplasty.The Journal of arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcomes of a comprehensive management program for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Osteoarthritis management programs (OAMPs) have become a more common way to deliver patient-centered care. However, there is limited information on real-world use of these programs to guide implementation, payment policy, accessibility, and scaling in the United States. This paper describes 5-year use metrics for the Duke Joint Health Program, an OAMP embedded within a US academic health system. Method: This analysis includes patients referred into the Program between October 2017 and April 2022. We generated descriptive statistics of referral and enrollment totals, demographics and patient-reported measures of enrollees, retention and healthcare use metrics (e.g., office visit frequency), and data capture rates for patient-reported outcomes. Results: During the study period, 6863 patients were referred to the program and 4162 (61 %) enrolled. We observed statistically significant differences between those who did and did not enroll by age (mean difference ± SE: 2.49 ± 2.8 years), sex (70.0 % vs 67.7 % female), race (65.1 % vs 55.3 % Caucasian/White), employment status (50.0 % vs 40.2 % retired), and insurance type (53.5 % vs 47.0 % Medicare). The median (Q1, Q3) number of visits was 2 (1, 4) and ranged from 1 to 67. The median (Q1, Q3) number of days from first to last program visit was 23 (0, 84) days. Questionnaire completion rates were 72 % at baseline, 46 % at 6 weeks, 39 % at 3 months, and 40 % at 6 and 12 months. Conclusion: Findings can guide the planning, development, and implementation of future OAMPs and inform policies to ensure programs are accessible and equitable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.