ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Prognostic factors and surgical management in pediatric primary lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study using SEER data.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lightweight hybrid foundation model for lung cancer prognosis based on low-dose chest X-ray images.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Endobronchial Pulmonary Typical Carcinoid Tumors in Young Adults: A Three-Case Series Highlighting Obstructive Complications and Surgical Outcomes.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Case report: diagnostic challenges and long-term survival of a child with bronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary lung cancer (LC) is extremely rare in pediatric patients, making diagnosis and management particularly challenging. Currently, there are no established guidelines for treating LC in this age group, and both prognosis and treatment experiences are scarcely studied. This study aims to evaluate prognostic factors and assess the survival benefits of surgical intervention in pediatric LC patients. Methods: Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database spanning from 1988 to 2019, encompassing 337 children aged 0-19 years diagnosed with primary LC. Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and surgical approaches were elucidated. Prognostic markers for overall survival (OS) were evaluated through univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. Survival analysis between groups utilized Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: The children indicated a median age of 15 years and the female-to-male ratio was close to 1:1. The most common pathological type was carcinoid tumor (31.45%). Most of the tumors were <5 cm in diameter (63.79%) or confined in situ (46.77%). The 5-year OS rate for the entire cohort was 77.9%, with pathologic classification, SEER stage, surgery, and tumor size identified as independent prognostic factors. Pulmonary/pleuropulmonary blastoma [hazards ratio (HR): 6.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.69-24.35; P=0.006] or adenocarcinoma (HR: 8.82; 95% CI: 2.20-35.25; P=0.002), no surgery (HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.13-3.72; P=0.02), and tumor size ≥5 cm (HR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.20-6.89; P=0.02) were associated with a worse prognosis in pediatric LC patients. In localized of SEER stage (HR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.04-0.56; P=0.005) was associated with a better prognosis in pediatric LC patients. Common pathological types including carcinoid, pulmonary/pleuropulmonary blastoma, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma demonstrated the most favorable prognosis (P<0.001). Surgery did not significantly benefit patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IV (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.42-1.62; P=0.58) or distant-stage disease (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.33-1.06; P=0.06). Conversely, children with regional lymph node metastasis (HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.06-0.88; P=0.02) or AJCC stage III-IV (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.87; P=0.02) showed improved survival following lymph node dissection. Tumor size also influenced surgical decision-making, with smaller tumors (<5 cm) favoring surgical resection, including lobectomy (P<0.001) or local tumor resection (P=0.03), while larger tumors exhibited advantages with less specificity regarding surgical approach (P=0.15). Conclusions: This study identified pathologic classification, SEER stage, surgery, and tumor size as independent prognostic factors for pediatric LC. For children with advanced-stage LC, surgical intervention may not extend survival time. This study underscores the importance of tailoring therapeutic strategies based on histology, disease stage, and tumor size. These findings offer valuable insights into managing pediatric LC, enabling more informed clinical decisions and potentially enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.