ReviewTranslational pediatrics2024
Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus from 1991 to 2024: a systematic review and bibliometrics analysis.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) puts children and elderly individuals worldwide at risk for severe health issues and financial difficulties. Prevention is the main treatment for RSV infection, as there is currently no particular therapy. By using bibliometrics analysis, this study attempted to map the increasing tendency in the prevention of RSV infection from January 1991 to August 2024 and to examine the frontiers and hotspots of related research. Methods: We extracted pertinent articles through the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on August 26, 2024, covering the period between January 1991 and August 2024. Then, an online bibliometrix interface (https://bibliometrics.com), R software (version 4.3.2), CiteSpace V6.1R6 (64-bit) software, and the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology were used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 709 eligible data points pertaining to the prevention of RSV were included. The United States, England, and the Netherlands were the three major contributors to this field. The most productive journal was Conclusions: In the past 30 years, the research on RSV prevention has entered a stage of rapid development, and many vaccines and monoclonal antibodies have entered the clinical research stage, and some have been marketed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.