ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Significance of binocular fusion in enhancing visual acuity during amblyopia treatment.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking perceptual distortions in amblyopia: toward a multi-feature, visual-field-wide perspective.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, the exploration of amblyopia treatment methods is gradually shifting to the restoration of binocular visual perceptual function. Binocular fusion function, as an important component of binocular visual function, mainly reflects the patient's ability to integrate the signals received from both eyes. In this study, we investigated the relationship between binocular fusion function and improvement in visual acuity during amblyopia treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients with amblyopia, aged 3-14 years old, who visited an outpatient clinic in Shenzhen Eye Hospital between May 2021 and January 2023. The investigation included 105 patients (210 eyes) with isometropic or anisometropic amblyopia. All participants underwent cycloplegic refraction examination and binocular fusion function measurement. All patients underwent standard amblyopia treatment, and those with the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.6 or higher in the amblyopic eye of both eyes received binocular fusion training using a computer platform. Results: A statistically significant negative correlation (-0.263, P=0.007) was observed between the absolute difference in binocular BCVA and binocular fusion function at the start of treatment (baseline). Linear regression analysis revealed that the improvement in BCVA in the amblyopic eye exhibited correlations with several factors, including the baseline binocular BCVA difference, baseline BCVA of the amblyopic eye, improvement in binocular fusion function, and the number of fusion training sessions (regression coefficients: -0.463, -0.771, 0.007, and 0.063, respectively; all P<0.05). Two patterns of binocular fusion function development during treatment were identified using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM): the slow growth pattern and the rapid growth pattern. The results of a multivariate logistic regression model indicated a statistically significant link between fusion training and the development pattern of binocular fusion function [odds ratio (OR): 5.219, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.045-13.323]. Conclusions: Enhancing binocular fusion function may result in an improvement of BCVA in the amblyopic eye of patients with amblyopia. The frequency of binocular fusion training is crucial for rapid improvement in binocular fusion function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.