Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524387›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024

Surgical technique: placement of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) through a cephalic vein cutdown in pediatric patients.

Javier Arredondo Montero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Javier Arredondo MonteroPediatric Surgery Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0943-6367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The placement of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) is a critical step in the overall care of pediatric oncohematologic patients. These devices constitute a significant technical challenge and are not free of complications during their placement and use. There is extensive literature concerning placement techniques, including venous cut-down (mainly from the external jugular vein) and venous access through ultrasound-guided puncture (Seldinger technique), usually performed in jugular or subclavian veins. Considering that in chronic patients, especially oncology patients, the preservation of quality central venous accesses is essential, alternatives for peripherally inserted central venous catheters have been proposed. The cephalic vein is a peripheral accessory vein located at the deltopectoral groove and characterized by well-defined surgical landmarks. Although scarce and focused on adult populations, the preceding literature concerning using the cephalic vein for TIVAP placement shows promising results. In this manuscript, I present my experience using this technique in pediatric populations, detailing the necessary preoperative preparation to perform the procedure safely, the technical aspects of its implantation, and the most relevant postoperative considerations. Critical knowledge gaps concerning this technique that warrant further study, such as the role of ultrasound as a predictor of success for cephalic vein cut-down TIVAP placement in pediatric populations, are also discussed.

Indexed as

cephalic veinpediatricperipherally inserted central catheterTotally implantable venous access port (TIVAP)venous cutdown

Identifiers

PMID39524387
PMCPMC11543127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.