ArticleTranslational pediatrics2024
Surgical technique: placement of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) through a cephalic vein cutdown in pediatric patients.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking routine technical choices in minor surgery: a retrospective cohort study of implantable venous port catheter placement.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
- Effects of totally implantable venous access ports on complications and quality of life in gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The placement of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) is a critical step in the overall care of pediatric oncohematologic patients. These devices constitute a significant technical challenge and are not free of complications during their placement and use. There is extensive literature concerning placement techniques, including venous cut-down (mainly from the external jugular vein) and venous access through ultrasound-guided puncture (Seldinger technique), usually performed in jugular or subclavian veins. Considering that in chronic patients, especially oncology patients, the preservation of quality central venous accesses is essential, alternatives for peripherally inserted central venous catheters have been proposed. The cephalic vein is a peripheral accessory vein located at the deltopectoral groove and characterized by well-defined surgical landmarks. Although scarce and focused on adult populations, the preceding literature concerning using the cephalic vein for TIVAP placement shows promising results. In this manuscript, I present my experience using this technique in pediatric populations, detailing the necessary preoperative preparation to perform the procedure safely, the technical aspects of its implantation, and the most relevant postoperative considerations. Critical knowledge gaps concerning this technique that warrant further study, such as the role of ultrasound as a predictor of success for cephalic vein cut-down TIVAP placement in pediatric populations, are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.