Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524329›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Graph spiking neural network for advanced urban flood risk assessment.

Zhantu Liang, Xuhong Fang, Zhanhao Liang, Jian Xiong, Fang Deng, Tadiwa Elisha Nyamasvisva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhantu LiangDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Dongguan 523133, Guangdong, China.
Xuhong FangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, Guangdong, China.
Zhanhao LiangDepartment of Automatic Control, Kyrgyz State Technical University after named I.Razzakov, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Jian XiongDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Dongguan 523133, Guangdong, China.
Fang DengDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Dongguan 523133, Guangdong, China.
Tadiwa Elisha NyamasvisvaFaculty of Engineering, Science, and Technology, Department of Information Technology Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur (IUKL), Kajang, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban flooding significantly impacts city planning and resident safety. Traditional flood risk models, divided into physical and data-driven types, face challenges like data requirements and limited scalability. To overcome these, this study developed a model combining graph convolutional network (GCN) and spiking neural network (SNN), enabling the extraction of both spatial and temporal features from diverse data sources. We built a comprehensive flood risk dataset by integrating social media reports with weather and geographical data from six Chinese cities. The proposed Graph SNN model demonstrated superior performance compared to GCN and LSTM models, achieving high accuracy (85.3%), precision (0.811), recall (0.832), and F1 score (0.821). It also exhibited higher energy efficiency, making it scalable for real-time flood prediction in various urban environments. This research advances flood risk assessment by efficiently processing heterogeneous data while reducing energy consumption, offering a sustainable solution for urban flood management.

Indexed as

Computer scienceEarth sciencesEngineering

Identifiers

PMID39524329
PMCPMC11544073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.