ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Normative In-Game Data for Collegiate Baseball Pitchers Using Markerless Tracking Technology.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Segmental Momentum Sequencing: Implication for Injury and Performance Between Collegiate Pitchers With Different Arm Slots.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Within-subject time series angular velocity differences between in-game high and low velocity fastballs in college baseball pitchers.Sports medicine and health science · 2025Article
- Differences in Pitching Kinetics and Kinematics During Various Effort Level Pitching.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of In-Game Trunk and Upper Extremity Kinematics Between Fastballs, Breaking Balls, and Changeups in NCAA Division I Collegiate Baseball Pitchers.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current standard for motion capture data collection in baseball biomechanics is marker-based optical motion capture. Recent advancement in markerless motion capture capabilities has greatly improved accessibility to in-game, high-precision motion capture data, but specific values may differ from markered systems, necessitating separate normative values. For future data comparison, reference data are needed. Purpose: To describe common kinematic variables in baseball pitching using an in-game markerless motion capture system. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Kinematic data were collected in 2 collegiate stadiums in the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Southeastern Conference using 8 synchronized 300-Hz KinaTrax cameras placed around the playing field. The in-game biomechanics data of 51 pitchers from 5 different teams during the 2023 season were collected; only pitchers with >3 outings during the season were included. After averaging all available fastballs thrown in the first inning of a game, we analyzed triaxial trunk (rotation, flexion, and lean) and pelvic rotation angles in the global reference frame, as well as shoulder rotation, shoulder horizontal abduction, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, stride knee flexion, and hip-shoulder separation. Results: A total of 509 fastballs were analyzed. Mean fastball velocity was 40.98 m/s (91.5 mph), with a vertical break of 42.0 ± 10.6 cm (16.5 ± 4.2 inches) and a horizontal break of 28.0 ± 11.1 cm (11.0 ± 4.4 inches). Mean stride length was 1.41 ± 0.08 m. The mean arm slot was 59.4°± 9.3°, and the mean upper arm slot was 72.9°± 9.3° at ball release. Additional normative time-series data are presented for commonly analyzed variables, and discrete metrics are provided at distinct time points in the pitching cycle. Conclusion: These data fill a need for separate norms for in-game, markerless motion capture performance metrics, and biomechanics for collegiate baseball pitchers to be used as reference values for researchers, coaches, and clinicians. Clinical Relevance: Clinicians should use these results as reference values to contextualize injury mechanisms and the injury-performance trade-off. These data will also educate clinicians on what athletes' bodies must do to perform when constructing plans of care and return-to-play timelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.