ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2024
Comparative Study between Proximal Femoral Nail Anti Rotation and Proximal Femoral Nail Anti Rotation Asian to Assessing Functional Outcome.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the most common fractures around the pelvis and hip joint. Intrerotrochanteric fracture commonly occurs in elderly adult as a result of a simple domestic fall or slippage due to osteoporosis and young adult due to high-energy trauma. In 1990, 26% of all intertrochanteric fractures were reported in Asia, this figure is estimated to 32% in 2025 and 38% in 2050. The main purpose of our study to differentiate functional, radiological, and clinical outcomes of intertrochanteric fracture treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation and Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation Asian. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized prospective study of 68 intertrochanteric fracture patients (34 cases in the PFN group and 34 cases in the PFN A2 group) from February 2022 to April 2024. Data were collected based on the Harris Hip Score questionnaire at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and data were entered into Microsoft Excel. Demographic data, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, union rates, and complications were recorded and compared between both groups. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Science software version 26. Results: The mean age was 66.2 ± 15.8 in PFNA2 group whereas 63.1 ± 16 years in PFN group. Majority of the patients were male (63.2%) in both groups whereas female constituting 36.8%. Surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss were significantly less in the PFN A2 group, but functional outcome at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months; complications were not significantly different in both groups. Screw cutout noticed in PFN A2 whereas reverse Z effect observed in PFN follow-up cases. Conclusion: Our study infer that PFN A2 has significant advantages when compare to conventional PFN like statistically significant less surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss with faster union time with smaller incision. Implant-related complications are lesser in PFN A2 that indicate biomechanical dominance of helical blade device over conventional dual screw system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.