Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524233›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2024

Venous Malformations: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions.

Arun Kamireddy, Clifford R Weiss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. CT and MRI imaging of mass in the carotid space: a pictorial review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arun KamireddyDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Clifford R WeissDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous malformations (VMs) represent the most common type of congenital vascular anomalies, characterized by slow-flow lesions arising from disorganized angiogenesis. These malformations can vary widely in size, location, and clinical impact, presenting significant challenges in diagnosis and management. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for optimizing care, with goals centered on symptom relief and functional preservation. Diagnostic evaluation typically involves clinical examination, imaging, and, in complex cases, genetic testing. Interventional radiology, particularly sclerotherapy and endovascular embolization, has become the first-line treatment, complemented by surgical and emerging molecular therapies, particularly targeting the mTOR/PI3K/AKT pathway. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the genetics, clinical presentation, and key diagnostic imaging aspects of VMs, along with a detailed discussion of current treatment modalities, emerging therapeutic techniques, and future directions for improving patient care.

Indexed as

ablationembolizationinterventional radiologysclerotherapyvenous malformations

Identifiers

PMID39524233
PMCPMC11543112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.