ArticleADMET & DMPK2024
Modelling of chromatographic and electrophoretic behaviour of imidazoline and alpha adrenergic receptors ligands under different acid-base conditions.
Article in ADMET & DMPK, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The ligands of the imidazoline and α-adrenergic receptors are mainly imidazoline and guanidine derivatives, known as centrally-acting antihypertensives and compounds with potential use in various neurological disorders. The extent of their ionisation has a major influence on their behaviour in the different analytical systems. The main objective of this work was to compare the mechanism of chromatographic retention and electrophoretic mobility under acidic, neutral and basic conditions. Experimental Approach: Multiple Linear Regression and Partial Least Squares Regression were applied for the QSRR (quantitative structure-retention relationship) and QSMR (quantitative structure-mobility relationship) modelling and to select the most important molecular parameters describing the chromatographic and electrophoretic behaviour of the investigated compounds. Key Results: The most important molecular descriptors, such as the chemical composition of the compounds, lipophilicity, polarizability and molecular branching, in the selected QSRR models showed that an important insight into the retention behaviour can be derived from the 0D-, 1D- and 2D-descriptors. The electrophoretic mobility could be explained by 2D- and 3D-descriptors, which provide information on the molecular mass, size and complexity, as well as on the influence of charge transfer and electronic properties on the migration behaviour. Conclusion: All created QSRR/QSMR models met the stringent validation criteria and showed high potential in describing the chromatographic and electrophoretic behaviour of investigated compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.