ArticleCureus2024
Streamlining the Non-operative Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Closed-Loop Audit Evaluating the Introduction of a Standardised Gastrografin Protocol in a District General Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Are the systemic immune-inflammation index and panimmune-inflammation value predictive indicators for the decision of operative treatment in adhesive small bowel obstruction?Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common cause of admissions to general surgery services. Water-soluble contrast (WSC), such as Gastrografin® (GGF), can be utilised in the conservative management of patients with ASBO, with predictive and possible therapeutic value. We audited the non-operative management of ASBO in the general surgery department of East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, a district general hospital. Following the introduction of a hospital-wide protocol standardising the use of GGF in patients with ASBO, a re-audit was conducted to assess its impact. Methods A retrospective audit of ASBO patients who received GGF was conducted in two cycles: before and after the implementation of the protocol. Data were collected between February and June 2022 for group 1 (pre-protocol) and between August and November 2023 for group 2 (post-protocol). Results Forty-eight patients were included in the analysis across both groups: 31 in group 1 (pre-protocol) and 17 in group 2 (post-protocol). The success rate of this non-operative trial with GGF increased from 77% (24/31) in group 1 to 88% (15/17) in group 2. The median duration of conservative management was two days in both groups. The median time from CT scan to GGF administration decreased from 24 hours in group 1 to 19 hours 22 minutes in group 2, and the interval between GGF administration and first abdominal radiograph decreased from 9 hours in group 1 to 6 hours 25 minutes in group 2. Conclusion Our closed-loop audit suggests that by streamlining the non-operative management pathway of adhesive small bowel obstruction, our standardised protocol is safe and possibly improves efficiency within a district general hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.