Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524166›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Recurrence of Retinopathy of Prematurity Following Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (Anti-VEGF) Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohammed Dablouk, Amit Chhabra, Ahmed T Masoud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The CAPA framework: a conceptual model integrating corrective and preventive strategies for retinal ischemia and neovascularization.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP): Are We There Yet?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Advances in pharmacological research for retinopathy of prematurity].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. A review on retinopathy of prematurity.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammed DabloukInternal Medicine, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Merseyside, GBR.
Amit ChhabraOphthalmology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, GBR.
Ahmed T MasoudEpidemiology and Public Health, Fayoum University, Faiyum, EGY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a neovascular disorder which affects premature infants and can lead to childhood blindness. Treatment includes laser photocoagulation and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, both effective options. However, laser photocoagulation can lead to refractive errors, while anti-VEGF therapy can result in disease recurrence. Our systematic review aimed to evaluate the recurrence rates of ROP following treatment with anti-VEGF agents compared to other anti-VEGF agents and laser photocoagulation. We also aimed to measure the retreatment intervals and assess successful retreatment rates to identify the most effective treatment modality. Our review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and included both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized comparative studies (NCS). A thorough search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was performed. Studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2) tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to measure pooled estimates. The outcomes were reported as risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD). A total of 21 studies (six RCTs and 15 NCS) with 6,152 eyes were included. Overall, anti-VEGF agents showed a higher risk of recurrence compared to laser photocoagulation (RR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.06-4.33, p=0.03). Conbercept demonstrated a significantly lower risk of recurrence than laser photocoagulation and ranibizumab (RR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.39-0.58, p<0.00001), while aflibercept showed a higher recurrence risk compared to bevacizumab (RR=12.61, 95% CI: 6.43-24.73, p<0.00001). Bevacizumab was associated with a longer retreatment interval than laser photocoagulation (SMD=0.89, 95% CI: 0.61-1.17, p<0.00001). No significant differences in retreatment success rates between bevacizumab and laser photocoagulation were observed. Anti-VEGF therapy is effective in the treatment of ROP; however, it is associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared to laser photocoagulation. Conbercept shows greater efficacy in reducing recurrence risk and prolonging the retreatment interval compared to ranibizumab. Aflibercept demonstrated inconsistent outcomes. No significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Recurrences occurred significantly later when anti-VEGF therapy was used compared to laser photocoagulation. Successful retreatment rates between bevacizumab and laser photocoagulation were similar.

Indexed as

anti-vegf therapylaser photocoagulationrecurrenceretinopathy of prematurityretreatment

Identifiers

PMID39524166
PMCPMC11550109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.