ReviewCureus2024
Recurrence of Retinopathy of Prematurity Following Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (Anti-VEGF) Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Infants Treated with Anti-VEGF Agents versus Laser Photocoagulation or Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Temporal Changes in Screen-Detected Retinopathy of Prematurity Among Screened Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants Born Before 32 Weeks of Gestation: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optic Nerve Alterations Following Intravitreal Injection and Laser in Infants With Retinopathy of Prematurity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- The CAPA framework: a conceptual model integrating corrective and preventive strategies for retinal ischemia and neovascularization.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Current role of aflibercept in retinopathy of prematurity - A review.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP): Are We There Yet?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Current and Emerging Pharmacologic Therapies for Diabetic Retinopathy.Pharmacotherapy · 2026Review
- Short-Term Efficacy of Two-Step Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity in a Japanese Cohort: Anti-VEGF Therapy Followed by Routine Laser Photocoagulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Advances in pharmacological research for retinopathy of prematurity].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2025Review
- A review on retinopathy of prematurity.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a neovascular disorder which affects premature infants and can lead to childhood blindness. Treatment includes laser photocoagulation and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, both effective options. However, laser photocoagulation can lead to refractive errors, while anti-VEGF therapy can result in disease recurrence. Our systematic review aimed to evaluate the recurrence rates of ROP following treatment with anti-VEGF agents compared to other anti-VEGF agents and laser photocoagulation. We also aimed to measure the retreatment intervals and assess successful retreatment rates to identify the most effective treatment modality. Our review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and included both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized comparative studies (NCS). A thorough search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was performed. Studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2) tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to measure pooled estimates. The outcomes were reported as risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD). A total of 21 studies (six RCTs and 15 NCS) with 6,152 eyes were included. Overall, anti-VEGF agents showed a higher risk of recurrence compared to laser photocoagulation (RR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.06-4.33, p=0.03). Conbercept demonstrated a significantly lower risk of recurrence than laser photocoagulation and ranibizumab (RR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.39-0.58, p<0.00001), while aflibercept showed a higher recurrence risk compared to bevacizumab (RR=12.61, 95% CI: 6.43-24.73, p<0.00001). Bevacizumab was associated with a longer retreatment interval than laser photocoagulation (SMD=0.89, 95% CI: 0.61-1.17, p<0.00001). No significant differences in retreatment success rates between bevacizumab and laser photocoagulation were observed. Anti-VEGF therapy is effective in the treatment of ROP; however, it is associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared to laser photocoagulation. Conbercept shows greater efficacy in reducing recurrence risk and prolonging the retreatment interval compared to ranibizumab. Aflibercept demonstrated inconsistent outcomes. No significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between bevacizumab and ranibizumab. Recurrences occurred significantly later when anti-VEGF therapy was used compared to laser photocoagulation. Successful retreatment rates between bevacizumab and laser photocoagulation were similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.