Surgical Training Pathways in the United Kingdom and the United States: Lessons for Resource-Limited Settings From High-Income Countries.

Background Surgical training is a critical component of healthcare, especially in high-income countries such as the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US), which have established distinct, well-organised training frameworks. Comparing these systems provides valuable insights that may enhance global surgical education, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where training and retaining proficient surgeons are considerable challenges. Methodology This comparative study examines the surgical training systems in the UK and the US, focusing on key aspects, including training structure, competency-based assessments, and work-hour regulations. Data were sourced from regulatory organisations such as the General Medical Council, the Royal College of Surgeons, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and the American Board of Surgery. The analysis explores how elements of these models might be adapted to support sustainable surgical education frameworks in resource-limited environments. Ethical approval was not required due to the use of publicly accessible data and no patient involvement. Results The UK and US surgical training systems differ substantially in their structure, training duration, and specialisation timing. The UK employs a tiered approach, offering generalist experience before specialisation, while the US favours early specialisation directly after medical school. Both systems implement competency-based evaluations, though the US system places a greater emphasis on case volume and procedural exposure. Work-hour regulations also vary, with the UK capping weekly hours at 48 under the European Working Time Directive, compared to an 80-hour maximum in the US, which results in differing levels of trainee satisfaction and burnout rates. Conclusions The competency-based assessments in both the UK and the US offer adaptable frameworks for resource-limited settings. The phased training approach in the UK is well-suited for environments requiring versatile surgeons capable of handling a wide range of cases. By implementing these adaptable elements, along with cost-effective training innovations such as simulation tools, e-learning platforms, and international partnerships, resource-constrained regions can foster a sustainable, skilled surgical workforce. These insights offer pathways to improve healthcare outcomes and equity globally by enhancing surgical capacity in regions with limited resources.