ArticleVascular health and risk management2024
Clinical Accuracy of the G.LAB MD41A0 Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor in Pregnancy and Pre-Eclampsia Using the AAMI/ESH/ISO as Reference Standard.
Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Validation of blood pressure (BP) monitors in pregnant women are needed to ensure the accurate measurement of BP in pregnancy. Therefore the study aimed to evaluate the measurement accuracy of the G.LAB MD41A0 oscillometric automatic upper-arm blood pressure monitor in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia women according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018). Methods: A total of 45 pregnant women were included in the cross-sectional validation study. The same left-arm sequential method was used for blood pressure measurement, and the blood pressure differences between the test device and the mercury standard reference were assessed according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard. Results: The participants included 15 normotensives, 15 gestational hypertension and 15 pre-eclampsia. The average (mean ± SD) differences between the device and mercury standard was -0.84±3.88 mmHg and -0.58±3.35 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, for the validation Criterion 1. The SD of the averaged differences between the device and reference readings per participant was 2.92 mmHg and 2.28 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, for the Criterion 2 of the universal standard. Conclusion: The G.LAB MD41A0 automatic upper-arm blood pressure monitor fulfills the criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard and can be recommended for clinical use and self-measurement in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.