Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524121›Full record

ArticleDiscover public health2024

Identifying influential factors using machine learning techniques on the intention to receive a COVID-19 booster dose and vaccine fatigue among partially vaccinated individuals.

Athina Bikaki, Justin M Luningham, Erika L Thompson, Brittany Krenek, Jamboor K Vishwanatha, Ioannis A Kakadiaris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Athina BikakiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4752-1500
Justin M LuninghamDepartment of Population & Community Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5037-9149
Erika L ThompsonDepartment of Quantitative and Qualitative Health Sciences, University of Texas, San Antonio, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7115-0001
Brittany KrenekDepartment of Population & Community Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX USA.ORCID 0009-0009-0079-0050
Jamboor K VishwanathaInstitute for Health Disparities, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0266-6020
Ioannis A KakadiarisDepartment of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5983-7268

Funding

ACTIV Integration of Host-targeting Therapies for COVID-19 Administrative Coordinating CenterOT2HL156812 · NHLBI · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI NOLEN, TRACY L, THOMAS, SONIA M · 2020 to 2024
$1270.7M
NHLBI Maternal Morbidity and Mortality (3M) Administrative Coordinating CenterOT2HL158287 · NHLBI · WESTAT, INC. · PI Chanza Baytop · 2020 to 2026
$433.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL156812NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL158287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assesses COVID-19 booster intentions and hesitancy in Texas, a state known for its diversity and libertarian values. A survey was conducted with 274 participants residing in Texas between June and July 2022. The analysis examined sociodemographic and health-related factors, trusted information sources, and preventive behaviors. The survey focused on vaccinated participants and their intention to receive the booster dose, which was categorized into three outcomes: yes, no, and not sure. Machine learning techniques were employed to analyze the survey responses of vaccinated participants to identify the most critical factors. Among the participants, 113 expressed their intention to get the booster (41.2%), 107 did not plan to receive the booster (39.1%), and 54 remained undecided (19.7%). Our findings indicate that the perception of vaccine safety significantly influenced the decision to receive the booster dose. Those who reported trust in social media contacts as reliable information sources were more likely to intend to boost. Additionally, among those hospitalized when diagnosed with COVID-19, the largest proportion were unwilling to receive the booster (47.0%) compared to those who intended to receive the booster (33.3%). In contrast, most of those who believed they would be hospitalized if infected with COVID-19 intended to get the booster. Other factors did not demonstrate a significant association. Our findings are highly transferable and can offer valuable insights, particularly for countries where COVID-19 remains prevalent and are pivotal both presently and in the future for developing strategies to improve booster uptake and shape public health initiatives in epidemic and pandemic outbreaks.

Indexed as

COVID-19Feature selectionPandemic fatigueVaccinationVaccine boosterVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39524121
PMCPMC11543762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.