Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39524066›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2024

Research report: Management of dysphagia using pharyngeal electrical stimulation in the general intensive care population - A service development.

Thomas Williams, Elizabeth Walkden, Karishma Patel, Naomi E Cochrane, Brendan A McGrath, Sarah Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas WilliamsUniversity Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Lancaster, UK.
Elizabeth WalkdenDepartment of Speech, Voice and Swallowing, Wythenshawe Hospital, Wythenshawe, UK.
Karishma PatelThe University of Manchester Medical School, Manchester, UK.
Naomi E CochraneManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-7587
Brendan A McGrathManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Sarah WallaceDepartment of Speech, Voice and Swallowing, Wythenshawe Hospital, Wythenshawe, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1593-7827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dysphagia places a substantial burden on the critically ill, affecting 12%-84% of this cohort, and is independently associated with worse outcomes. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES-treatment) is a novel dysphagia therapy with an emerging evidence base. This retrospective observational study describes our dysphagia service and reports the use of PES-treatment as a standard of care in recovering critically ill patients at a single-site tertiary UK hospital. Methods: Patients admitted to Acute or Cardio-Thoracic adult intensive care units between 1st July 2017 and 30th June 2022 were routinely referred to Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) following tracheostomy, or suspected dysphonia/dysphagia. Clinical assessments and direct laryngeal visualisation using Fibreoptic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) were performed. Severe dysphagia was defined as Penetration-Aspiration Score of ⩾6 and patients were offered PES-treatment when staffing allowed. Results: Of 289 patients with severe dysphagia, 19 underwent a course of PES-treatment with the remaining patients receiving standard care. PES-treatment patients were significantly less likely to remain nil-by-mouth (11.1% vs 62.5%, Chi Conclusion: Our observations suggest that PES may be effective in the general critical care population. PES may offer new treatment options for patients and healthcare staff managing severe dysphagia and its significant consequences.

Indexed as

critical caredysphagialarynxPharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES)swallowingtracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID39524066
PMCPMC11549722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.