ArticleHeart rhythm O22024
Predictors of first-pass isolation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lifestyle modification in atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms, phenotypes and ablation outcomes.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- First-pass isolation and procedural metrics associated with catheter ablation outcomes for atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- First-Pass Isolation as an Independent Predictor of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Predictive Value of Real-World Cardiologist Performance (RWCP) Score in Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Risk After Radiofrequency Ablation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Article
- Risk of acute pericarditis after pulsed-field ablation pulmonary vein isolation.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Optimized workflow for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using very high power short duration.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of the first-pass pulmonary vein isolation on ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is superior to antiarrhythmics for the management of atrial fibrillation, but repeat ablation is often required for durable rhythm control. Factors influencing first-pass isolation (FPI) and whether FPI predicts durable isolation are not well known. Objective: The study sought to determine factors associated with FPI and rates of chronic reconnection among those with and without FPI at index PVI in patients undergoing repeat ablation. Methods: We retrospectively identified 483 patients at our institution who underwent first-time PVI in 2021. Of these, 63 who had repeat ablation between 2021 and 2023 were included in the study. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis for predictors of FPI during index PVI. Results: The mean age was 65 years, 67% of patients were male, 90% were White, and 73% had persistent atrial fibrillation. At index PVI, FPI was achieved in 58% of left pulmonary veins (PVs), 48% of right PVs, and 25% of posterior wall isolations. Bilateral FPI was achieved in 35% of patients. At redo PVI, the right superior PV (47%) was most frequently reconnected. Lack of PFI of the right PVs at index PVI was associated with a 14-fold risk of chronic reconnection. Elevated left atrial voltage predicted the absence of FPI of the right PVs but not the left PVs. Conclusion: Increased left atrial voltage predicts a lack of FPI in the right PVs but not in the left PVs. Lack of FPI of right PVs predicts chronic reconnection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.