ArticleKidney medicine2024
Preliminary Outcomes of NephSIM Nephrons: A Virtual Mentorship Program to Foster Interest in Nephrology.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why Not Transplant Nephrology? A Survey of US Nephrology Fellows.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- Preliminary Outcomes of NephSIM Nephrons: A Virtual Mentorship Program to Foster Interest in Nephrology.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- The evolution of social media in nephrology education: A mini-review.Frontiers in nephrology · 2023Review
- "Reasons … the reasons that we're here:" Young pediatric nephrologists reflect on the profession.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite concerted efforts by the nephrology community to increase the quality of nephrology education via a plethora of free open access medical education tools and efforts by national nephrology societies, interest in nephrology has mostly remained stagnant. Methods: A 6-month virtual learning and mentoring program (NephSIM Nephrons) was launched in January 2021 to increase interest in nephrology careers among medical students and residents. Trainees were assigned one faculty mentor and a small group with faculty and other trainees. Learning opportunities consisted of both live and virtual sessions and an asynchronous curriculum. Feedback was collected from trainees at the end of the program each year through an online, anonymous survey. For trainees in the 2021 and 2022 cohort, residency/fellowship status for the July 2024-2025 academic year was assessed by survey. Results: Of 319 and 315 eligible applications received for the 2021 and 2022 programs, 111 and 108 trainees were accepted, respectively; 31 participants in the 2023 cohort completed the exit survey (response rate: 31/84, 37%) and rated the mean overall NephSIM Nephrons experience as 4.7 of 5. All respondents were very likely or somewhat likely to recommend the experience to other trainees. In the 2021 and 2022 cohorts, 37 of 49 (77%) and 29 of 38 (76%) trainees, respectively, who were eligible to match into adult or pediatric nephrology fellowships by July 2024 successfully matched. Similarly, among the 2021 and 2022 cohorts, 11 of 19 (58%) and 21 of 23 (91%), respectively, who could be internal medicine or pediatrics residents in July 2024 successfully matched. Limitations: Low survey response rate. Conclusions: Early outcome analysis of the NephSIM Nephrons program shows promising results, and individuals who participated had high rates of enrollment in nephrology pipeline residencies and nephrology fellowships. More work is needed to first continue rigorous follow-up of program participants, obtain qualitative program feedback, and improve participant and mentor engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.