Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39523992›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

Death and Dying in the Emergency Department: A New Model for End-of-Life Care.

Kay McCallum, Debra Jackson, Helen Walthall, Helen Aveyard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kay McCallumOxford Brookes University, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1757-5368
Debra JacksonUniversity of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-5325
Helen WalthallOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Helen AveyardOxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5133-3356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeath and dying remain taboo subjects in society today and therefore people may come to the end of their life without having thought about what death and dying might be like and what it is to have a good death. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the experience of death and dying in a hospital emergency department. Culturally, some individuals are unprepared for death, and when death occurs in an emergency setting it can be particularly shocking.

methodsA phenomenological study was undertaken, based on the existential phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty; and framed by the nurse theorist Hildegard Peplau. Bereaved relatives and registered nurses gave in-depth interviews describing their experiences and the interviews were analysed using an adaptation of the work of Thomas and Pollio (2002) and Hycner (1985), consistent with Merleau-Ponty's theories.

resultsThe study brings new understanding of what it is like to die in an emergency setting through new understanding of what the accompanying relatives/friends of the deceased person experience, aided by new understanding of the experiences of emergency nurses.

conclusionsA nursing model based both on the work of Peplau (Parse et al. 2000) and on the work of the nurse theorists Ruland and Moore (1998) and Zaccara et al. (2017) was devised for use in the emergency department when death occurs. It is hoped that this model will help nurses improve the care given to this group of patients and their loved ones.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathEmergency Service, HospitalModels, NursingNursing Staff, HospitalTerminal CareAdultAgedEmergency NursingFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchdeathdyingemergency departmentend‐of‐lifeend‐of‐life carepatient and family experiencephenomenologyterminal care

Identifiers

PMID39523992
PMCPMC12159370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.