Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39523990›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep-Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain.

Kei Nishimaki, Kengo Onda, Kumpei Ikuta, Jill Chotiyanonta, Yuto Uchida, Susumu Mori, Hitoshi Iyatomi, Kenichi Oishi, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Change points for dynamic biomarkers in the Alzheimer's disease pathological cascade: A 30-year cohort study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kei NishimakiThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kengo OndaThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kumpei IkutaDepartment of Applied Informatics, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan.
Jill ChotiyanontaThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yuto UchidaThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Susumu MoriThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hitoshi IyatomiDepartment of Applied Informatics, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi OishiThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-8611
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Tammie Lee Smith Benzinger · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHINDLER, SUZANNE ELIZABETH · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
TRD 4: Platforms for multi-modal and multi-scale imaging dataP41EB031771 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Hanzhang Lu, Peter CM Van Zijl · 2021 to 2026
$9.9M
Forecasting response to pharmacological interventions in Alzheimer's and related dementias based on medical record and brain MRI characteristics: A precision medicine approachR21AG070404 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI OISHI, KENICHI · 2020 to 2020
$450k
Department of Defense W81XWH-12-2-0012NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS R21 AG070404NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031771NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces OpenMAP-T1, a deep-learning-based method for rapid and accurate whole-brain parcellation in T1- weighted brain MRI, which aims to overcome the limitations of conventional normalization-to-atlas-based approaches and multi-atlas label-fusion (MALF) techniques. Brain image parcellation is a fundamental process in neuroscientific and clinical research, enabling a detailed analysis of specific cerebral regions. Normalization-to-atlas-based methods have been employed for this task, but they face limitations due to variations in brain morphology, especially in pathological conditions. The MALF techniques improved the accuracy of the image parcellation and robustness to variations in brain morphology, but at the cost of high computational demand that requires a lengthy processing time. OpenMAP-T1 integrates several convolutional neural network models across six phases: preprocessing; cropping; skull-stripping; parcellation; hemisphere segmentation; and final merging. This process involves standardizing MRI images, isolating the brain tissue, and parcellating it into 280 anatomical structures that cover the whole brain, including detailed gray and white matter structures, while simplifying the parcellation processes and incorporating robust training to handle various scan types and conditions. The OpenMAP-T1 was validated on the Johns Hopkins University atlas library and eight available open resources, including real-world clinical images, and the demonstration of robustness across different datasets with variations in scanner types, magnetic field strengths, and image processing techniques, such as defacing. Compared with existing methods, OpenMAP-T1 significantly reduced the processing time per image from several hours to less than 90 s without compromising accuracy. It was particularly effective in handling images with intensity inhomogeneity and varying head positions, conditions commonly seen in clinical settings. The adaptability of OpenMAP-T1 to a wide range of MRI datasets and its robustness to various scan conditions highlight its potential as a versatile tool in neuroimaging.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAtlases as TopicHumansNeuroimagingbraindeep‐learningMRIparcellationsegmentationT1

Identifiers

PMID39523990
PMCPMC11551626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.