Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39523955›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Heart failure2025

Mavacamten: Real-World Experience From 22 Months of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program.

Milind Y Desai, Dewey Seto, Michael Cheung, Sonia Afsari, Niki Patel, Arnaud Bastien, Jeffrey Lockman, Michele Coiro, Matthew W Martinez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Tailored therapeutics for cardiomyopathies.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. A New Era in the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Cardiac myosin inhibitors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Milind Y DesaiHypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Heart Vascular Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (M.Y.D.).ORCID 0000-0003-0010-9797
Dewey SetoBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (D.S., M. Cheung, S.A., N.P., A.B., J.L., M. Coiro).
Michael CheungBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (D.S., M. Cheung, S.A., N.P., A.B., J.L., M. Coiro).
Sonia AfsariBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (D.S., M. Cheung, S.A., N.P., A.B., J.L., M. Coiro).
Niki PatelBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (D.S., M. Cheung, S.A., N.P., A.B., J.L., M. Coiro).
Arnaud BastienBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (D.S., M. Cheung, S.A., N.P., A.B., J.L., M. Coiro).
Jeffrey LockmanBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (D.S., M. Cheung, S.A., N.P., A.B., J.L., M. Coiro).
Michele CoiroBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (D.S., M. Cheung, S.A., N.P., A.B., J.L., M. Coiro).
Matthew W MartinezHypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Morristown Medical Center, Atlantic Health System, NJ (M.W.M.).ORCID 0000-0001-9255-4657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMavacamten is the only cardiac myosin inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with symptomatic New York Heart Association class II-III obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Under the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program for mavacamten, patients are required to be monitored for the development of systolic heart failure and reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to <50%. We report results from the mavacamten Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy database (April 28, 2022 to February 27, 2024).

methodsData on health care providers and pharmacy certification, patient monitoring (from Patient Status Forms, based partly on echocardiograms), and screening for drug interactions before each dispense were collected.

resultsOf the 6299 patients who received ≥1 dose of mavacamten, 60.0% were women; 64.6% were aged >60 years. Of the 5573 patients with submitted Patient Status Forms, 256 (4.6%) developed LVEF <50%, and 71 (1.3%) experienced heart failure requiring hospitalization. On the 29 111 status forms in these patients, each representing an assessment of an echocardiogram, LVEF <50% was reported on 276 (0.9%), and heart failure requiring hospitalization was reported on 86 (0.3%). Of the 1929 patients with ≥1 year of treatment, 78 (4.0%) had an LVEF reduction to <50%, and 4 (0.2%) experienced LVEF <50% and heart failure requiring hospitalization but later resumed treatment. Of the 3228 patients initiated on 5 mg/d mavacamten and were treated for at least 6 months, 2391 (74.1%) remained at 5 or 10 mg/d. At 3 and 6 months following mavacamten treatment initiation, 57.2% and 70.3%, respectively, demonstrated post-Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient <30 mm Hg.

conclusionsWe describe the feasibility and experience of the first 22 months of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program for prescribing mavacamten in >6000 patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The need for temporary interruption for LVEF <50% was low, including for patients on therapy ≥1 year, with even fewer LVEF reductions associated with heart failure requiring hospitalization.

Indexed as

AminobutyratesCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicHeart FailureAgedBenzylaminesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStroke VolumeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUracilVentricular Function, LeftAminobutyratesBenzylaminesMYK-461Uracilcardiomyopathy, hypertrophicpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID39523955
PMCPMC11745710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.