ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2024
Factors affecting healing of rotator cuff repairs: microfracture of the greater tuberosity.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the impact of microfractures generated within the footprint of the greater tuberosity (GT) on postoperative cuff healing following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ARCR for full-thickness rotator cuff tear (FTRCT) between April 2020 and October 2023 at our institution. A total of 73 patients was categorized into two groups based on the presence of microfractures: a microfracture group (group M, n=33) and a non-microfracture group (group N, n=40). Six months post-surgery, magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess cuff healing and retear rates between the two groups. Furthermore, patients were stratified into retear and healing groups based on cuff integrity to analyze the factors influencing retear.
resultsThere was no significant difference in retear rates between groups M and N (18.2% vs. 10.0%, P=0.332). Among demographic factors, age showed a significant difference between the retear and healing groups (67.4±8.5 vs. 61.6±6.1, P=0.044). ML tear size (3.1±1.7 vs. 2.0±1.1, P=0.015), AP tear size (2.4±1.2 vs. 1.6±1.0, P=0.332), FI of the supraspinatus (2.3±1.3 vs. 1.4±1.0, P=0.029), and FI of the infraspinatus (1.6±1.3 vs. 0.9±0.8, P=0.015) exhibited significant differences between the retear and healing groups.
conclusionsARCR with concurrent microfracture of the GT footprint did not significantly impact cuff healing in patients with FTRCT. However, older age and larger ML tear size were associated with an increased risk of retear. Level of evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.