Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39523693›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025

Comparison of Suture Anchor Repair and Suture Tape Augmentation for Reconstruction of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament: A Biomechanical Study.

Qingfeng Shao, Dahai Hu, Xinru Chen, Huajun Wang, Lei Xiao, Qiang Teng, Jinsong Hong, Huige Hou, Xiaofei Zheng

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qingfeng ShaoDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Dahai HuDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9484-077X
Xinru ChenThe Biomedical Translational Research Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Huajun WangDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Lei XiaoDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiang TengDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinsong HongDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Huige HouDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5133-0737
Xiaofei ZhengDepartment of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability, The Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Precision Orthopedics and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 21623119Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 21623319Medical Joint Fund of Jinan University YXJC2022005Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province A2023143Project of China University Sports Association 202203007Project of Clinical Medical Research in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University 2018009Science and technology development fund (FDCT) of Macao FDCT0012/2023/EIB2Science and technology development fund (FDCT) of Macao FDCT0032/2022/AGJScience and Technology Innovation and Sports Culture Development Research Project of Guangdong Provincial Sports Bureau GDSS2022M002Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 202201020087Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2023A03J0605Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2023A03J1015Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2024A03J0971Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2024A04J4173scientific research and cultivation fund of the Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Jinan University No.202101002The Clinical Frontier Technology Program of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, China JNU1AF-CFTP-2022-a01204The Research Fund Program of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Speed Capability Research 2023B1212010009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrently, there are various surgical options for the treatment of lateral ankle sprains, and deciding which surgical option to use is a question worth considering. Furthermore, there is a relative scarcity of mechanical research comparing suture anchor repair (SAR) and suture tape augmentation (STA) internal brace for the repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of arthroscopically all-inside ATFL SAR and STA for reconstruction to treat lateral ankle sprains through biomechanical testing.

methodsEighteen fresh-frozen cadaver ankles were used for the study and divided into one of three groups: (1) intact ATFL group, (2) arthroscopically reconstructed with suture tape augmentation internal brace of the ATFL (STA group), and (3) arthroscopically repaired ATFL with suture anchors (SAR group). We used custom fixtures to test the specimens for loading to ultimate failure and stiffness.

resultsThe mean load to failure of the STA group (311.20 ± 52.56 N) was significantly higher than that of the intact ATFL group (157.37 ± 63.87 N; p = 0.0016) and the SAR group (165.27 ± 66.81 N; p = 0.0025). The mean stiffness of the STA group (30.10 ± 5.10 N/mm) was significantly higher than that of the intact ATFL (14.17 ± 6.35 N/mm; p = 0.0012) and the SAR group (15.15 ± 6.89 N/mm; p = 0.0021). The suture anchor repair withstood failure loads and stiffness similar to the intact ATFL.

conclusionsIn terms of failure load and stiffness, the reconstructive outcome of ATFL reconstruction with STA is markedly superior to that of SAR reconstruction of the ATFL and the intact ATFL. Additionally, the novel technique of the SAR was a reliable technique that offered biomechanical properties similar to intact ATFL.

Indexed as

Ankle InjuriesLateral Ligament, AnklePlastic Surgery ProceduresSurgical TapeSuture AnchorsAgedArthroscopyBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSuture Techniquesanterior talofibular ligamentarthroscopicbiomechanicalsuture anchortape augmentation

Identifiers

PMID39523693
PMCPMC11735374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.