Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39523681›Full record

ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2025

Cholate Shunt, Oral Cholate Challenge and Endoscopic Lesions of Portal Hypertension: The SHUNT-V Study.

Mitchell Shiffman, K Rajender Reddy, Michael D Leise, Kamran Qureshi, Alastair D Smith, Steve Helmke, John Kittelson, Michael P McRae, Joanne C Imperial, Gregory T Everson and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03583996 (The HepQuant SHUNT Liver Diagnostic Kit for Likelihood of Large Esophageal Varices), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03583996 nacompletednot on this map

The HepQuant SHUNT Liver Diagnostic Kit for Likelihood of Large Esophageal Varices: The SHUNT-V Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHepQuant, LLCRan2019 to 2022Enrolled306ConditionsChronic Liver DiseaseArmsHepQuant SHUNT Liver Diagnostic Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Future of Endoscopy in Surveillance of Esophageal Varices.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mitchell ShiffmanBon Secours Liver Institute of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
K Rajender ReddyUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael D LeiseMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kamran QureshiSaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Alastair D SmithSyneos Health, Morrisville, North Carolina, USA.
Steve HelmkeHepQuant, LLC, Denver, Colorado, USA.
John KittelsonUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Michael P McRaeCustom DX Solutions LLC, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2126-9442
Joanne C ImperialConsultant to HepQuant, LLC, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Gregory T EversonHepQuant, LLC, Denver, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0454-3566
SHUNT‐V Investigators

Funding

HepQuant, LLC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accuracy of current criteria for ruling out large oesophageal varices (LEV) and other endoscopic lesions of portal hypertension (PH) may be compromised by obesity and MASLD/MASH.

aimsIn the US multicentre SHUNT-V study, we evaluated the disease severity index (DSI) for detecting LEV and other lesions of PH at endoscopy.

methodsSubjects were adults with compensated cirrhosis scheduled for endoscopy to screen for varices. DSI was calculated from clearances of labelled cholates after oral and intravenous administration. DSI ≤ 18.3 was evaluated as a cut-off for ruling out LEV with acceptance criteria of negative likelihood ratio < 0.52 and sensitivity > 85%.

resultsSHUNT-V enrolled 306 subjects; 275 had both DSI and endoscopy, and 238 had Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (52.1% MASLD/MASH, 25.2% chronic hepatitis C and 15.6% alcoholic liver disease; 87% were overweight, 64% were obese and 54% had diabetes). AUROCs for DSI ranged from 0.81 to 0.82 for LEV and 0.79 to 0.80 for all significant PH lesions. DSI 18.3 had sensitivity 96.3%-100% for LEV and 97.3%-100% for all significant PH lesions. If DSI ≤ 18.3 were used as the sole determinant to defer EGD, 27%-35% of EGDs could have been avoided with 0%-3.7% of LEV and 0%-2.7% of all significant PH lesions missed.

conclusionsHepQuant DSI predicts the likelihood of LEV and significant PH lesions across a spectrum of patient characteristics and disease aetiologies. DSI, based on liver function and portal-systemic shunting, can aid in the decision to defer endoscopy for varices in patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis.

trial registrationThe SHUNT-V study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03583996).

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesHypertension, PortalLiver CirrhosisAdministration, OralAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPseudotumor CerebriSeverity of Illness Indexcholate clearancedisease severity indexesophagogastroduodenoscopyportal hypertensionquantitative liver function test

Identifiers

PMID39523681
PMCPMC11636074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.