Trial reportJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025
Denosumab for osteoporosis in older adults in long-term care: A randomized trial.
Trial report in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of antiresorptive and anabolic therapies for male osteoporosis: an updated Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Impact of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Mineral Density and Trabecular Score Following Denosumab Discontinuation in Older Adults in Long-Term Care.Calcified tissue international · 2025Trial
- Denosumab-efficacy, safety, persistence and sequential strategies-a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Review
- Anti-osteoporotic Pharmacotherapy and Muscle Outcomes in Osteosarcopenia: a Source-Verified Translational Evidence Map.Calcified tissue international · 2026Review
- Preventing Hip (Proximal Femoral) Fractures: An Evidence-Based Review for Clinicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Real-world effectiveness of denosumab compared to teriparatide in patients with severe osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Effects and Complications of Hip Arthroplasty After Failure of Internal Fixation in Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Denosumab improves bone mineral density, promotes fracture healing, and reduces recurrent fractures in patients with osteoporotic fractures.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn long-term care (LTC), the incidence of hip or vertebral fractures are eight times that in the community. Despite the wide availability of osteoporosis therapy, LTC residents are omitted from pivotal trials and not treated. Denosumab is a relatively new, monoclonal antibody therapy for osteoporosis treatment. Via a randomized trial, we sought to determine the safety and efficacy of denosumab in LTC residents.
methodsWe conducted a 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in 201 osteoporotic men and women aged ≥ 65 years, living in LTC communities. Participants with multimorbidity, dysmobility, and cognitive impairment were not excluded. The intervention was denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous every 6 months or placebo. Our primary outcome measures were hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) improvement at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included BMD at other skeletal sites, function, and safety.
resultsWe included 123 women and 78 men with a mean ± standard error age of 81.5 ± 0.6. Overall, 83% and 71% completed 12 and 24 months, respectively. Compared with placebo, the women receiving denosumab had a greater 24-month percent increase in spine (7.41 ± 0.93 vs. 2.15 + 0.56; p = 0.014), and total hip BMD (4.62 ± 0.62 vs. -0.19 ± 0.79; p = 0.007); and men in spine (7.91 ± 0.96 vs. 1.12 ± 1.13; p = 0.002) and total hip (3.74 ± 0.55 vs. 0.48 ± 0.74; p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in safety metrics.
conclusionsDenosumab was a safe and effective therapy for improving BMD in osteoporotic older men and women with multiple comorbidities in LTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.