Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39523676›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025

Denosumab for osteoporosis in older adults in long-term care: A randomized trial.

Susan L Greenspan, Subashan Perera, Nami Safai Haeri, David A Nace, Neil M Resnick

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Denosumab-efficacy, safety, persistence and sequential strategies-a systematic review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan L GreenspanDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Subashan PereraDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nami Safai HaeriDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5115-5980
David A NaceDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3742-6991
Neil M ResnickDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Sustaining Skeletal Health in Frail Elderly - S1 Competing RevisionR01AG052123 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GREENSPAN, SUSAN L · 2016 to 2020
$4.3M
Preserving Geriatric Muscle with an Osteoporosis MedicationR01AG081359 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Christine E Kistler · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052123NIA NIH HHS R01 AG081359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn long-term care (LTC), the incidence of hip or vertebral fractures are eight times that in the community. Despite the wide availability of osteoporosis therapy, LTC residents are omitted from pivotal trials and not treated. Denosumab is a relatively new, monoclonal antibody therapy for osteoporosis treatment. Via a randomized trial, we sought to determine the safety and efficacy of denosumab in LTC residents.

methodsWe conducted a 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in 201 osteoporotic men and women aged ≥ 65 years, living in LTC communities. Participants with multimorbidity, dysmobility, and cognitive impairment were not excluded. The intervention was denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous every 6 months or placebo. Our primary outcome measures were hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) improvement at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included BMD at other skeletal sites, function, and safety.

resultsWe included 123 women and 78 men with a mean ± standard error age of 81.5 ± 0.6. Overall, 83% and 71% completed 12 and 24 months, respectively. Compared with placebo, the women receiving denosumab had a greater 24-month percent increase in spine (7.41 ± 0.93 vs. 2.15 + 0.56; p = 0.014), and total hip BMD (4.62 ± 0.62 vs. -0.19 ± 0.79; p = 0.007); and men in spine (7.91 ± 0.96 vs. 1.12 ± 1.13; p = 0.002) and total hip (3.74 ± 0.55 vs. 0.48 ± 0.74; p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in safety metrics.

conclusionsDenosumab was a safe and effective therapy for improving BMD in osteoporotic older men and women with multiple comorbidities in LTC.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabOsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMaleTreatment OutcomeBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabbone densitydenosumablong‐term careosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID39523676
PMCPMC11828690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.