Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39523598›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical statistics

A Bayesian Dynamic Model-Based Adaptive Design for Oncology Dose Optimization in Phase I/II Clinical Trials.

Yingjie Qiu, Mingyue Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yingjie QiuPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-9429-2131
Mingyue LiPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Funding

UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sandi Leigh Pruitt · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543NCI NIH HHS P30CA142543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), there is growing concern over the "more is better" paradigm developed decades ago for chemotherapy, prompting the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to initiate Project Optimus to reform dose optimization and selection in oncology drug development. For early-phase oncology trials, given the high variability from sparse data and the rigidity of parametric model specifications, we use Bayesian dynamic models to borrow information across doses with only vague order constraints. Our proposed adaptive design simultaneously incorporates toxicity and efficacy outcomes to select the optimal dose (OD) in Phase I/II clinical trials, utilizing Bayesian model averaging to address the uncertainty of dose-response relationships and enhance the robustness of the design. Additionally, we extend the proposed design to handle delayed toxicity and efficacy outcomes. We conduct extensive simulation studies to evaluate the operating characteristics of the proposed method under various practical scenarios. The results demonstrate that the proposed designs have desirable operating characteristics. A trial example is presented to demonstrate the practical implementation of the proposed designs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicNeoplasmsResearch DesignBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansModels, StatisticalAntineoplastic Agentsadaptive designBayesian methoddelayed outcomesmodel selectionoptimal dosePhase I/II trial

Identifiers

PMID39523598
PMCPMC11889989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.