ArticleScientific reports2024
WGAN-based multi-structure segmentation of vertebral cross-section MRI using ResU-Net and clustered transformer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated lumbar spine segmentation in MRI using an enhanced U-Net with inception module and dual-output mechanism.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vertebral foramen, lamina, and vertebral body are three critical components of the spine structure, essential for maintaining spinal connectivity and stability. Accurately segmenting lumbar structures such as the vertebral body, vertebral foramen, and lamina in MRI cross-sections helps doctors better understand and diagnose the pathological causes of spine-related diseases. This study presents a multi-structure semantic segmentation method for vertebral transverse section MRI slices using WGAN with a residual U-Net and clustered Transformer. The generator network was replaced with a combination of a residual U-Net and a clustered Transformer-based segmentation network. The enhanced U-Net encoder, utilizing dilated convolutions and residual structures, improved multi-scale feature extraction capabilities. Meanwhile, the clustered Transformer structure, with reduced progressive linear complexity, ensured the extraction of global positional information. The results of multiple experiments show that the Dice coefficient for vertebral body segmentation increased by 3.1%, the Hausdorff distance decreased by 0.6 mm, mIOU improved by 4.1-96.2%, and PPV increased by 2.0-98.8% compared to mainstream segmentation models. These improvements are statistically significant (p < 0.05).Ablation experiments further validated the effectiveness of the proposed enhanced modules in improving segmentation accuracy for the three target structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.