ArticleScientific reports2024
Determination of priority control factors for risk management of heavy metal(loid)s in park dust in Mianyang City.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to determine the priority control elements and sources of heavy metal(loid)s (HMs) pollution in park dust, this study collected dust samples from 25 parks in the urban area of Mianyang City and measured the contents of 10 HMs. Based on Monte Carlo simulation, the probabilistic pollution levels and ecological-health risks of HMs were assessed. We found that the average contents of Zn, Co, Pb, and Cr were much higher than their background values in local soil and were influenced by artificial activities. The pollution assessment found that 5 parks were moderately polluted. The comprehensive pollution of HMs in the dust was mainly caused by Zn and Cr, and industrial source was the main contributor to Zn and Cr pollution. The contribution of As, Co, and Pb to the comprehensive ecological risk was high, accounting for 54.6%. Co, Pb, and As were the priority control HMs of ecological risk, while mixed source and industrial source were the priority control sources. HMs presented potential carcinogenic health risks to both children and adults. The non-carcinogenic risk to adults was within safety level, while some parks showed non-carcinogenic risk to children, which should be paid attention to. The source-specific health risk assessment showed that Cr and As were the priority control HMs for human health, while mixed source and industrial source were the priority control sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.