Trial reportPediatric research2025
On target dosing: erythropoietin exposure in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the HEAL trial.
Trial report in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe High-Dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) trial for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with therapeutic hypothermia demonstrated no neurodevelopmental benefit but was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events (SAEs). Understanding if targeted Epo plasma exposures were achieved in the HEAL trial and if SAEs were associated with higher exposures would help future therapeutic programs of Epo as a candidate neuroprotective treatment.
methodsAncillary study of a subset of HEAL neonates who received Epo (1000 U/kg IV on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7) and had plasma drug concentrations measured. Within a Bayesian pharmacokinetic framework, the area under the curve during the first 48 h (AUC
resultsAmong n = 89 neonates, variation in Epo exposure was low, and over 95% of neonates achieved the target AUC
conclusionsThe Epo dosing strategy in the HEAL trial consistently achieved target plasma exposures. Higher exposures were not associated with SAEs. IMPACT: In the HEAL randomized, placebo-controlled trial of high-dose erythropoietin (Epo) for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) receiving therapeutic hypothermia, the Epo dosing strategy achieved animal model neuroprotective plasma exposure targets in >95% of neonates. This understanding further strengthens the HEAL trial's primary conclusion that Epo provides no additional benefit in neonates with HIE also receiving therapeutic hypothermia. While Epo treatment was associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) compared to placebo in the primary HEAL trial, higher plasma exposures of Epo were not associated with the risk of SAEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39523391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.