ArticleRespiratory research2024
Atomized inhalation of indocyanine green in thoracoscopic surgery for intralobar pulmonary sequestration: a multicenter study.
Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status of various types of ICG contrast imaging in pediatric thoracic surgery.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Lobectomy versus lung-sparing resection for congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM): a single-center comparative study.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Wedge resection for pulmonary sequestration guided by indocyanine green fluorescence and 3-dimensional reconstruction.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Intralobar pulmonary sequestration with bronchogenic cyst: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Advances in Fluorescent Adjuncts in Pediatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Applications of Indocyanine Green Across Surgical Specialties.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInvestigate the safety and efficacy of preoperative atomization inhalation of indocyanine green (ICG) solution in precise lesion resection of pediatric thoracoscopic intralobar pulmonary sequestration.
methodsA multicenter 1:1 matched case-control study was adopted, to compare the safety and efficacy of the ICG group (preoperative atomization inhalation of 0.5 mg/kg ICG solution) with traditional group (no preoperative atomization inhalation of ICG solution). The baseline, intraoperative, and postoperative recovery conditions of the two groups were observed. Outpatient follow-up visits were conducted 3 to 6 months after surgery, including lung CT scans and pulmonary ventilation function tests.
results134 patients were included in the study. The ICG group included 67 patients, and the traditional surgery group included 67 patients matched at a ratio of 1:1 according to age and lesion location. There were no reports of deaths or adverse reactions. The postoperative chest drainage tube indwelling time [(53.19 ± 8.15) hours vs. (73.25 ± 15.51) hours, P < 0.001] and postoperative hospital stay [(4.81 ± 1.84) days vs. (6.72 ± 1.31) days, P < 0.001] were shorter in the ICG group than in the traditional group. More importantly, the postoperative pulmonary function in the ICG group was better than that in the traditional group. No residual lesions were found in the postoperative CT examination of both groups.
conclusionsThe innovative application of atomization inhalation of ICG provides the possibility for precise localization and lesion resection of pediatric thoracoscopic intralobar pulmonary sequestration. This maximizes the preservation of normal lung parenchyma, better improves postoperative pulmonary function, and shortens postoperative recovery time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.