Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39523316›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2024

Acetate production from corn stover hydrolysate using recombinant Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) with an EP-bifido pathway.

Jieni Zhu, Wei Liu, Leilei Guo, Xiaoxu Tan, Weikang Sun, Hongxu Zhang, Hui Zhang, Wenjia Tian, Tianyi Jiang, Wensi Meng and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. EfficientSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jieni ZhuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Wei LiuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Leilei GuoState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Xiaoxu TanState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Weikang SunState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Hongxu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Hui ZhangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Wenjia TianState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Tianyi JiangSchool of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, 250101, China.
Wensi MengState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Yidong LiuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Zhaoqi KangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Chao GaoState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China.
Chuanjuan LüState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China. chuanjuanlv@sdu.edu.cn.
Ping XuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Cuiqing MaState Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, No. 72 Binhai Road, Qingdao, 266237, P. R. China. macq@sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M742085National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFC2106000National Natural Science Foundation of China 32300045, 32300029Postdoctoral Innovation Program of Shandong Province No. SDCX-ZG-202400150Qingdao Postdoctoral Research Project QDBSH20230201011State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology SKLMTFCP-2023-03State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology Open Projects Fund M2023-02Youth Program of Natural Science Foundation of Qingdao City 23-2-1-31-zyyd-jchYouth Program of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2022QC092, ZR2023QC237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcetate is an important chemical feedstock widely applied in the food, chemical and textile industries. It is now mainly produced from petrochemical materials through chemical processes. Conversion of lignocellulose biomass to acetate by biotechnological pathways is both environmentally beneficial and cost-effective. However, acetate production from carbohydrate in lignocellulose hydrolysate via glycolytic pathways involving pyruvate decarboxylation often suffers from the carbon loss and results in low acetate yield.

resultsEscherichia coli BL21 (DE3) was confirmed to have high tolerance to acetate in this work. Thus, it was selected from seven laboratory E. coli strains for acetate production from lignocellulose hydrolysate. The byproduct-producing genes frdA, ldhA, and adhE in E. coli BL21 (DE3) were firstly knocked out to decrease the generation of succinate, lactate, and ethanol. Then, the genes pfkA and edd were also deleted and bifunctional phosphoketolase and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase were overexpressed to construct an EP-bifido pathway in E. coli BL21 (DE3) to increase the generation of acetate from glucose. The obtained strain E. coli 5K/pFF can produce 22.89 g/L acetate from 37.5 g/L glucose with a yield of 0.61 g/g glucose. Finally, the ptsG gene in E. coli 5K/pFF was also deleted to make the engineered strain E. coli 6K/pFF to simultaneously utilize glucose and xylose in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. E. coli 6K/pFF can produce 20.09 g/L acetate from corn stover hydrolysate with a yield of 0.52 g/g sugar.

conclusionThe results presented here provide a promising alternative for acetate production with low cost substrate. Besides acetate production, other biotechnological processes might also be developed for other acetyl-CoA derivatives production with lignocellulose hydrolysate through further metabolic engineering of E. coli 6K/pFF.

Indexed as

AcetatesEscherichia coliLigninMetabolic EngineeringZea maysFermentationGlucoseHydrolysisAcetatesGlucoseLigninlignocelluloseAcetateCarbon catabolite repressionCorn stover hydrolysateEP-bifido pathwayEscherichia coli

Identifiers

PMID39523316
PMCPMC11552437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.