ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Short-term adverse event rates and risk factors following total elbow arthroplasty for fracture and arthropathy: a matched analysis of nationally representative data.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Total elbow arthroplasty-a historical review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Short-term complications following distal humerus open reduction and internal fixation.JSES international · 2026Article
- Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on which potential prognostic factors for failure of total elbow replacement should be investigated.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTotal elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a mainstay treatment for elbow arthropathy and elbow fracture that can relieve pain and restore functional motion. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of surgical indication in the incidence of short-term adverse events and risk factors influencing complications in TEA to treat arthropathy compared to TEA for fracture. Matched cohorts were created to better isolate the impact of the surgical indication.
methodsThe study identified patients within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database that underwent TEA to treat arthropathy or fracture from 2010 to 2020. Matched cohorts were created to analyze the incidence of 30 day adverse events and risk factors for complications.
resultsThe study included 599 patients for analysis. The overall incidence of any adverse event was 9.7%. In matched cohorts of 218 patients, the fracture group experienced a higher incidence of overall adverse events (13.8% vs. 6.0% in the arthropathy group, p = 0.009) and postoperative transfusions (9.6% vs. 1.8% in the arthropathy group, p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed an increased risk of any adverse event in the combined matched cohort with longer operative times (OR = 1.007, CI: 1.002-1.012, p = 0.006) and those undergoing fracture treatment (OR = 2.447, CI: 1.047-5.717, p = 0.039). Outpatient status was associated with a lower risk of adverse events in the combined matched cohort (OR = 0.207, CI: 0.058-0.739, p = 0.015).
conclusionsEven when controlling for comorbidities, patients undergoing TEA for fracture have a greater likelihood of short-term complications, particularly requiring a blood transfusion. Treatment of a fracture and increased operative time were risk factors for all patients, while outpatient status was protective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.