ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024
Augmented Reality in Neurosurgery.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Improving neurosurgical precision: leveraging technology for enhanced visualization and navigation of complex neuroanatomy.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2026Article
- Research on an elderly low-vision field-aid system based on augmented reality.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Augmented Reality (AR) involves superimposing digital content onto the real environment. AR has evolved into a viable tool in neurosurgery, enhancing intraoperative navigation, medical education and surgical training by integrating anatomical data with the real world. Neurosurgical AR relies on several key techniques to be successful, which includes image segmentation, model rendering, AR projection, and image-to-patient registration. For each of these technical components, different solutions exist, with each having their own advantages and limitations.Intraoperative AR applications cover diverse neurosurgical disciplines including vascular, oncological, spinal, and functional surgeries. Preliminary studies indicate that AR may improve the understanding of complex anatomical structures and offer sufficient accuracy for use as a navigational tool. Additionally, AR shows promise in enhancing surgical training and patient education through interactive 3D models, aiding in the comprehension of intricate anatomical details. Despite its potential, the widespread adoption of AR in clinical settings depends on overcoming technical limitations and validating its clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39523276What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.