ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024
Machine and Deep Learning in Hyperspectral Fluorescence-Guided Brain Tumor Surgery.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hyperspectral imaging for tumor resection guidance in surgery: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Neurosurgical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant glioma resection is often the first line of treatment in neuro-oncology. During glioma surgery, the discrimination of tumor's edges can be challenging at the infiltration zone, even by using surgical adjuncts such as fluorescence guidance (e.g., with 5-aminolevulinic acid). Challenging cases in which there is no visible fluorescence include lower-grade gliomas, tumor cells infiltrating beyond the margin as visualized on pre- and/or intraoperative MRI, and even some high-grade tumors. One field of research aiming to address this problem involves inspecting in detail the light emission spectra from different tissues (e.g., tumor vs. normal brain vs. brain parenchyma infiltrated by tumor cells). Hyperspectral imaging measures the emission spectrum at every image pixel level, thus combining spatial and spectral information. Assuming that different tissue types have different "spectral footprints," eventually related to higher or lower abundances of fluorescent dyes or auto-fluorescing molecules, the tissue can then be segmented according to type, providing surgeons a detailed spatial map of what they see. However, processing from raw hyperspectral data cubes to maps or overlays of tissue labels and potentially further molecular information is complex. This chapter will explore some of the classical methods for the various steps of this process and examine how they can be improved with machine learning approaches. While preliminary work on machine learning in hyperspectral imaging has had relatively limited success in brain tumor surgery, more recent research combines this with fluorescence to obtain promising results. In particular, this chapter describes a pipeline that isolates biopsies in ex vivo hyperspectral fluorescence images for efficient labeling, extracts all the relevant emission spectra, preprocesses them to correct for various optical properties, and determines the abundance of fluorophores in each pixel, which correspond directly with the presence of cancerous tissue. Each step contains a combination of classical and deep learning-based methods. Furthermore, the fluorophore abundances are then used in four machine learning models to classify tumor type, WHO grade, margin tissue type, and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status in brain tumors. The classifiers achieved average test accuracies of 87%, 96.1%, 86%, and 93%, respectively, thus greatly outperforming prior work both with and without fluorescence. This field is new, but these early results show great promise for the feasibility of data-driven hyperspectral imaging for intraoperative classification of brain tumors during fluorescence-guided surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39523270What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.