Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39523269›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024

Machine Learning and Radiomics in Gliomas.

Santiago Cepeda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Santiago CepedaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Río Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain. scepedac@saludcastillayleon.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of machine learning (ML) and radiomics is emerging as a pivotal advancement in glioma research, offering novel insights into the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of these complex tumors. Radiomics involves the extraction of a multitude of quantitative features from medical images. When these features are analyzed through ML algorithms, the precision of tumor characterization is enhanced beyond traditional methods.This chapter examines the application of both supervised and unsupervised ML techniques for interpreting radiomic data, highlighting their potential for accurately predicting tumor grade, identifying genetic mutations, estimating patient survival rates, and evaluating treatment responses. The ability of ML-based radiomic analysis to discern intricate patterns in tumor imaging, imperceptible to human observation, is particularly emphasized.Challenges in this field, including data diversity, overfitting risks, and the need for extensive, annotated datasets, are critically assessed. The necessity of integrating these advanced technologies into clinical practice through interdisciplinary collaboration is underscored as a crucial factor for their effective utilization.Overall, the synergy between ML and radiomics in glioma research represents a significant step toward personalized medicine, offering enhanced tools for patient-specific treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm GradingPrecision MedicinePrognosisRadiomicsGliomaMachine learningRadiomicsTexture analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.