ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Minimum perceptual time (MPT). Repeatability and reproducibility of variables applied to "sports vision".
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Hand-Eye Coordination Task.Journal of eye movement research · 2025Article
- Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Saccadic Eye Movement Time Test.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose"Minimum Perceptual Time" (MPT) is the ability to take the most visual information in the least time. The purpose of the study was to assess intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of a MPT measurement method by using COI-SV
methodsMPT was measured in 79 participants by using COI-SV
resultsA total of 79 participants were included (mean age 32.8 ± 11.95 years, range 19-64 years). Regarding sex, there were no significant differences between men and women (p = 0.080), whereas age and MPT had an inverse correlation (p = 0.01). Interexaminer and intraexaminer repeatability proved to be moderate to good in all methods. Bland-Altman showed difference between sessions was 0.259 ± 2.189 (-4.030 and + 4.549) and difference between examiners was - 0.519 ± 2.104 (-4.642 and + 3.604).
conclusionMPT measurements with COI-SV KEY MESSAGES: WHAT IS KNOWN : Sports optometry is a relatively new field, so research is scarce and of poor quality. The scarcity of literature is practically limited to studies in the field of psychology, although they do not provide us with much information since they have not been studied for the mentioned field. The in-depth study of new standardized measurement methods would be of great help for optometrists in their clinical practice. WHAT IS NEW: This study is the first to determine intraobserver and interobserver repeatability and reproducibility for Minimum Perceptual Time (MPT) measurements acquired by the COI-SV® software, exhibiting ICC > 0.7 and establishing limits of agreement by using Bland-Altman analysis. In a significant way, MPT and age would have an inverse correlation, whereas MPT results would be better in men than women. Our results add evidence towards validating the test included in COI-SV® software so that the optometrist can include it in their clinical protocols in order to obtain more complete information on visual examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39523247What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.