ArticleJournal of nephrology2025
Kidney mRNA-protein expression correlation: what can we learn from the Human Protein Atlas?
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomic Characterization of Replication Stress and Impaired Antioxidant Defense in Tacrolimus-Induced Chronic Nephrotoxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Preliminary Exploration on Melatonin-Mediated Protective Effects in Intracranial Aneurysms: Transcriptomic, Proteomic, and Metabolomic Profiling of Cerebral Vascular Tissues Combined with in vivo Animal Experiments.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Zinc oxide nanoparticles mitigate insulin resistance in a D-galactose-induced C57BL/6 mouse model.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Lobaric Acid Exhibits Anticancer Potential by Modulating the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway in MCF-7 Cells.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Human Protein Atlas, with more than 10 million immunohistochemical images showing tissue- and cell-specific protein expression levels and subcellular localization information, is widely used in kidney research. The Human Protein Atlas contains comprehensive data on multi-tissue transcript and protein abundance, allowing for comparisons across tissues. However, while visual and intuitive to interpret, immunohistochemistry is limited by its semi-quantitative nature. This can lead to mismatches in protein expression measurements across different platforms.
methodsWe performed a comparison of the Human Protein Atlas' kidney-specific RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry data to determine whether the mRNA and protein abundance levels are concordant.
resultsOur study shows that there is a discordance between mRNA and protein expression in the kidney based on the Human Protein Atlas data. Using an external validation mass spectrometry dataset, we show that more than 500 proteins undetected by immunohistochemistry are robustly measured by mass spectrometry. The Human Protein Atlas transcriptome data, on the other hand, exhibit similar transcript detection levels as other kidney RNA-seq datasets.
conclusionsDiscordance in mRNA-protein expression could be due to both biological and technical reasons, such as transcriptional dynamics, translation rates, protein half-lives, and measurement errors. This is further complicated by the heterogeneity of the kidney tissue itself, which can increase the discordance if the cell populations or tissue compartment samples do not match. As such, shedding light on the mRNA-protein relationship of the kidney-specific Human Protein Atlas data can provide context to our scientific inferences on renal gene and protein quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.