ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2025
In-vitro Detection of Intramammary-like Macrocalcifications Using Susceptibility-weighted MR Imaging Techniques at 1.5T.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [A single repetition time quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging method for the lumbar spine using bipolar readout gradient].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of our study was to investigate the technical accuracy of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) created to detect intramammary-like calcifications depending on different TEs, volume, and type of calcification samples at 1.5T.
methodsJello-embedded particles of blackboard chalk and ostrich eggshell ranging in size from 4 to 25 mm
resultsJello proved to be a suitable base substance for preparing breast phantoms for SW MRI. Blackboard chalk and ostrich eggshell proved to be suitable for mimicking intramammary-like calcifications. The decrease in the median SNR of the blackboard chalk samples was significantly higher than the corresponding value of the ostrich eggshell samples over the entire TE range (47.5 to 17.0 vs. 16.0 to 6.56, P < 0.0001). The increase in the median CNR of the blackboard chalk samples was significantly higher than the corresponding value of the ostrich eggshell samples over the entire TE range (2.46 to 35.0 vs. 20.2 to 36.8, P = 0.007). With increasing TE value, the signal void volume of the calcification particle increases in the magnitude images as well as in SWI and QSM. Due to the blooming effect, the median gradients of the TE-based changes in signal void volumes were higher in SWI than in magnitude images and in QSM, regardless of the type of calcification particle examined. The maximum magnetic susceptibility of ostrich eggshell samples varied in a TE range of 1.88 to 15.52 ms from -7.2 to -2.51 ppm and that of blackboard chalk from -2.0 to -1.7 ppm. Compared to the manually measured volumes of the calcification particles, both MR-based measurements and CT examinations overestimated the actual sample size. The (non)-significant overestimation in the MRI-data is dependent on the set TE. The CT-based hyperdense volumes were overestimated compared to the corresponding manually measured sample volumes in a range of 109.8%-315.2% for ostrich eggshell samples (P = 0.016) and in a range of 39.9%-156.4% for blackboard chalk samples (P = 0.69).
conclusionOur systematic in-vitro investigation of magnitude images, SWI, and QSM revealed that various set TE values, different volumes, and compositions of calcifications have a significant impact on visualizing intramammary(-like) calcifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.