ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2025
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in solid organ transplant recipients.
Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Managing multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteraemia in immunocompromised hosts.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Gut Colonisation and Multidrug-Resistant Urinary Tract Infections in Hospitalised Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of outcomes of KPC-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam and other conventional antibiotics: retrospective single-center study.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Observational
- Pneumonia in lung transplant recipients: the role of donor, recipient, and hospital-acquired microorganisms.Respiratory research & clinical practice · 2026Article
- The changing epidemiology and long-term outcomes of patients with CRE infections.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Urinary Tract Infections and Bacterial Multidrug Resistance in Kidney Transplant Impact on Function and Graft Survival.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Epidemiology and outcomes of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infection in high-risk patients in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are an important threat to the health of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr); data comparing outcomes of SOTr with CRE to non-SOTr with CRE are lacking. A matched cohort study was performed within 2 prospective, multicenter, cohort studies (Consortium on Resistance Against Carbapenems in Klebsiella and other Enterobacterales and Consortium on Resistance Against Carbapenems in Klebsiella and other Enterobacterales 2). The epidemiology, desirability of outcome rankings outcomes, and mortality of SOTr and non-SOTr hospitalized in the United States (December 2011-August 2017) with clinical isolates with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined CRE were compared. In total, 121 SOTr and 242 matched non-SOTr were included. Fifty-one percent of isolates met infection criteria. SOTr were younger (P < .001), less acutely ill (P = .029), less often had a malignancy history (P = .006), and more often were admitted from home (P < .001) than non-SOTr. SOTr had more favorable adjusted desirability of outcome rankings outcomes; a randomly selected SOTr had a 58% (95% confidence interval, 53%-64%) probability of a better outcome as compared to a randomly selected non-SOTr. All-cause 30-day mortality was 14% (17/121) in SOTr vs 25% (60/242) in non-SOTr, P = .018. After stabilized inverse probability weighted adjustment, SOTr had a 7% lower 30-day mortality risk than non-SOTr (95% confidence interval, -15% to 1%). SOTr with CRE do not have worse outcomes than matched patients without transplant history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.