Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39522528›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2024

Induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived corneal epithelium for transplant surgery: a single-arm, open-label, first-in-human interventional study in Japan.

Takeshi Soma, Yoshinori Oie, Hiroshi Takayanagi, Shoko Matsubara, Tomomi Yamada, Masaki Nomura, Yu Yoshinaga, Kazuichi Maruyama, Atsushi Watanabe, Kayo Takashima and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Organoid-based strategies and challenges in tissue regeneration].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Regenerative therapy · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Takeshi SomaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshinori OieDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi TakayanagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Shoko MatsubaraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tomomi YamadaDepartment of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Masaki NomuraFacility for iPS Cell Therapy, CiRA Foundation, Kyoto, Japan.
Yu YoshinagaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuichi MaruyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan; Department of Vision Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan; Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Atsushi WatanabeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kayo TakashimaUehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Zaixing MaoR&D Division, Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Andrew J QuantockThe School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Ryuhei HayashiLaboratory of Stem Cells and Applied Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kohji NishidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan; Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan; Premium Research Institute for Human Metaverse Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan. Electronic address: nishidak@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe loss of corneal epithelial stem cells from the limbus at the edge of the cornea has severe consequences for vision, with the pathological manifestations of a limbal stem-cell deficiency (LSCD) difficult to treat. Here, to the best of our knowledge, we report the world's first use of corneal epithelial cell sheets derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to treat LSCD.

methodsThis non-randomised, single-arm, clinical study involved four eyes of four patients with LSCD at the Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Hospital. They comprised a woman aged 44 years with idiopathic LSCD (patient 1), a man aged 66 years with ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (patient 2), a man aged 72 years with idiopathic LSCD (patient 3), and a woman aged 39 years with toxic epidermal necrosis (patient 4). Allogeneic human iPSC-derived corneal epithelial cell sheets (iCEPSs) were transplanted onto affected eyes. This was done sequentially in two sets of HLA-mismatched surgeries, with patients 1 and 2 receiving low-dose cyclosporin and patients 3 and 4 not. The primary outcome measure was safety, ascertained by adverse events. These were monitored continuously throughout the 52-week follow-up period, and during an additional 1-year safety monitoring period. Secondary outcomes, reflective of efficacy, were also recorded. This study is registered with UMIN, UMIN000036539 and is complete.

findingsPatients were enrolled between June 17, 2019 and Nov 16, 2020. We had 26 adverse events during the 52-week follow-up period (consisting of 18 mild and one moderate event in treated eyes, and seven mild non-ocular events), with nine recorded in the additional 1-year safety monitoring period. No serious adverse events, such as tumourigenesis or clinical rejection, occurred during the whole 2-year observational period. At 52 weeks, secondary measures of efficacy showed that the disease stage had improved, corrected distance visual acuity was enhanced, and corneal opacification had diminished in all treated eyes. Corneal epithelial defects, subjective symptoms, quality-of-life questionnaire scores and corneal neovascularisation mostly improved or were unchanged. Overall, the beneficial efficacy outcomes achieved for patients 1 and 2 were better than those achieved for patients 3 and 4.

interpretationiCEPS transplantation for LSCD was found to be safe throughout the study period. A larger clinical trial is planned to further investigate the efficacy of the procedure.

fundingThe Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology-Japan, and the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesEpithelium, CornealInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsAdultAgedCorneal TransplantationFemaleHumansJapanMalePemphigoid, Benign Mucous MembraneStem Cell TransplantationStevens-Johnson SyndromeTreatment OutcomeVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID39522528
PMCPMC11694011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.