ReviewEarly human development2024
Validity and use of the Neonatal Infant Stressor Scale: An integrative review.
Review in Early human development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA Methylation ofBiological research for nursing · 2026Article
- Epigenetic consequences of toxic stress in preterm infants and their mothers: protocol for the premature infants, moms, and the social determinants of health-an epigenetic investigation study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStress exposure, operationalized as a count of painful or skin-breaking breaking procedures, is an important concept for inclusion in studies of preterm infants. The Neonatal Infant Stressor Scale (NISS) was developed to also account for nonpainful and environmental stressors; however, validity of this measure is unknown.
aimsThe purpose of this review was to define the breadth of use of the NISS in neonatal research studies and determine its predictive and concurrent validity.
methodsUsing the methods for integrative review, a systematic search of the literature was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase with keywords "NISS" OR "Neonatal Infant Stressor Scale". Study findings were narratively synthesized.
resultsTwenty-nine articles were retained for the review and included two cross-sectional studies describing development or adaptation of the measure, two protocols for empirical studies, and 25 empirical studies of preterm infants. Modifications to the original NISS were common and included addition or exclusion of specific stressors and use of unweighted scores. Although findings were inconsistent across studies, limited data support the predictive validity of the NISS, as higher NISS scores have been associated with abnormal brain development and cognitive, motor, and behavioral deficits. Two studies found concurrent associations between NISS scores and cortisol.
conclusionThe NISS may be a useful tool to quantify stressors experienced by preterm infants; however, there are only limited data to support its predictive or concurrent validity. The NISS may be particularly useful as a method to bring awareness to the infant's stress burden in clinical practice. Additional research is needed to validate inclusion of specific stressors in the NISS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.