ArticleSpine deformity2025
Should the C7-T1 Junction Be Feared? The Effect of a T1 Upper Instrumented Vertebra on Development of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vertebral bone quality in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Outcomes after vertebral body tethering for Lenke type 5 scoliosis continue to improve: analysis of different surgical techniques.Spine deformity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProximal junctional kyphosis is an infrequent complication in AIS; however, equipoise remains on the effects of ending a fusion proximally at the C7-T1 junction on the future development of PJK. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of PJK in patients with AIS who had a UIV of T1 vs those with a UIV of T2 at 5 years of follow-up.
methodsA query was performed of a prospective, multi-center AIS database of patients who received a PSF with at least 5 years of follow-up. Patients with a T1 UIV (n = 29) were compared to those with a T2 UIV (n = 58). PJK was defined as a proximal junctional angle (PJA) > 10 degrees.
resultsThere was no difference between the T1 and T2 UIV cohorts in preoperative T2-T12 kyphosis or pelvic incidence; however preoperatively, T1 UIV patients had a significantly decreased PJA at - 3° ± 4.5° as compared to T2 UIV patients 1.6° ± 6.5° (p = 0.0014). No patients with a T1 UIV experienced PJK at 5-years of follow-up, while 16% of patients with a T2 UIV experienced PJK (p = 0.025). No patients in the T2 UIV cohort required revision surgeries for their PJK. There was no difference found in total SRS22 scores, however at 5 years of follow-up, T2 UIV patients had better Pain domain scores (4.4 ± 0.6) vs T1 UIV patients (4.0 ± 0.6; p = 0.004).
conclusionWhile T1 is an uncommon UIV in AIS, at 5 years of follow-up, a T1 UIV did not result in PJK, nor did it result in a clinically significant change in patient-reported outcome scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39522082What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.