ArticleBMC medical education2024
Enhancing medical students' understanding of end-of-life care ethics and law through video-triggered expert-led debriefing: a two-stage study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The emerging trends of healthcare professions' ethics education in recent 10 years: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Legislative recognition and implementation challenges of living wills in China.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026Article
- Awareness, attitudes, and educational needs regarding the life-sustaining treatment decision-making act in Korea among healthcare providers and medical students: a comparative analysis.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTaiwan enacted the Hospice Palliative Care Act in 2000 and the Patient Autonomy Act in 2016. However, medical education has emphasized palliative care skills over ethical and legal integration. This study developed a curriculum for pre-clinical students, focusing on applying these issues in end of life care.
methodsThe participants were fourth-year medical students enrolled in a 1-credit medical ethics and law course at a medical school in Taiwan. The study employed a two-stage design, combining quantitative pretests and posttests with qualitative data obtained through the Know-Want-Learn strategy. The curriculum, called the video-triggered expert-led debrief module, included a video scenario on end of life care, insights shared by three interprofessional experts, and students debrief. In 2021, 168 students participated, and a quantitative questionnaire using a pretest-posttest design was applied to assess the curriculum's impact on students' knowledge and attitudes toward end of life care. In 2022, 157 students participated, and the survey used open-ended questionnaires (the Know-Want-Learn strategy) to evaluate what students already knew and what they wanted to know before the module, as well as what they had learned afterward.
resultsIn 2021, we collected 166 (98.8%) valid responses in the quantitative questionnaire. Seven of the eight knowledge-based questions and four of the seven learning motivation items showed significant improvement in the posttest (P < 0.05). In 2022, 81 (51.6%) valid responses were obtained from the qualitative questionnaire. Before the module, students' understanding was superficial and focused on literal meanings. Three themes emerged in what they wanted to know: medical decision-making, ethics and laws, and empathetic communication, with eight subthemes. After the module, three themes and six subthemes were identified in the "what I learned" section. Students reported gaining knowledge related to ethics and laws, and empathetic communication.
conclusionsThe video-triggered expert-led debrief module can effectively teach the application of medical ethics and laws in end of life care. This approach has shown positive results among young medical students. It enhances students' learning motivation, deepens their understanding of ethics and laws, and empathetic communication. It further encourages them to reflect deeply on the meaning of healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.